Airlines Can Hide Baggage Fees Again After Court Ruling

WASHINGTON - A Fifth Circuit ruling has eliminated the requirement for airlines to show baggage and change fees upfront, reverting to 2011-era disclosure standards.

By Bob Vidra 4 min read

Stay current with our airline news coverage.

WASHINGTON - That brief era when you could actually see what a flight would really cost before clicking through three screens? It's over. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit just struck down the Department of Transportation's 2024 rule that forced airlines and booking sites to display baggage and change fees right alongside fares during your initial search. We're officially back to the days of fee hide-and-seek.

What the Court Decided

The Fifth Circuit didn't take issue with the idea of fee transparency; they had a problem with how DOT went about it. According to Reuters, the court found that the agency "skipped a required public comment period on a study" tied to the rule. In other words, it was a procedural defect, not a philosophical disagreement about whether travelers deserve to know what they're paying. But the practical effect is the same. The 2024 rule "no longer has legal force," Reuters reported, and DOT was required to update the Code of Federal Regulations. That means we're reverting to the framework that existed before 2024, specifically a 2011 rule that let airlines bury fee disclosures deeper in the booking process.

What You're Losing

The 2024 rule would have required airlines and ticket agents to display specific fees for things like checked bags and flight changes right when you're comparing fares. That meant you could actually see whether that $200 Spirit fare was really cheaper than the $250 Delta ticket once you added the cost of a carry-on and a checked bag. It was the kind of apples-to-apples comparison that makes sense for literally every other consumer purchase but has somehow remained controversial in the airline industry. Now? You're back to clicking through to individual airline sites or digging into the fine print to figure out what bringing a suitcase will cost you. The information is still technically available; it's just not where you need it when you're making the actual buying decision.

The Old Rules Are Back

The 2011 framework that's now back in effect does require some fee disclosure, but it's far less useful for comparison shopping. Airlines must make fee information available somewhere on their websites, but they don't have to show it during the search and selection process. You might find a fee chart buried in a FAQ section or tucked away under "optional services," but good luck using that to quickly compare what three different airlines will actually charge you for the same trip with the same luggage.

The Comparison Shopping Problem

Here's the thing about airline pricing: it's gotten incredibly complicated, and not by accident. Base fares tell you almost nothing about what you'll actually pay, especially on ultra-low-cost carriers where the advertised price might not even include a seat assignment or overhead bin space. When fees are disclosed upfront during search, you can make informed decisions. When they're not, you're either doing mental math across multiple browser tabs or just hoping for the best. And it's not just about budget carriers. Even legacy airlines now charge for things that used to be included, and those fees vary by route, fare class, and sometimes even your loyalty status. Without upfront disclosure, the lowest displayed fare often isn't the lowest total price; it's just the most aggressively unbundled one. The 2024 rule wasn't asking airlines to eliminate fees or even reduce them. It was simply requiring them to be honest about the total cost at the moment when travelers are deciding which flight to book. The fact that this proved controversial enough to end up in federal court tells you a lot about how valuable fee opacity is to airline revenue models.

What Happens Next

DOT could theoretically try again, this time following the proper procedural steps the Fifth Circuit found lacking. But that takes time, political will, and a regulatory environment that prioritizes consumer protection over industry preferences. In the current climate, it's not clear any of those conditions are met. For now, airlines have won back the right to make you work a little harder to figure out what you're actually paying. So what should travelers do? The same thing savvy flyers have always done: assume the displayed fare is incomplete, factor in your typical baggage needs before comparing prices, and don't trust any fare that looks too good until you've clicked all the way through to see the final total. It's more work than it should be, but it's the reality we're back to living with. The fee information is still out there. You'll just have to go hunting for it again.

More travel news

Keep Exploring

International departure sign at Narita airport Japan

Japanese Airlines Hike Fuel Fees Despite Price Drop

TOKYO, Japan - All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines are hitting passengers with fuel surcharges topping $400 on long-haul flights, even as Asian jet fuel prices fall sharply from March highs.

5 min read
American Airlines

American Airlines Disrupts Loyalty With $35 Upgrades

FORT WORTH, Texas - American Airlines' ultra-cheap last-minute upgrade offers are sparking debate over whether the carrier is undermining its own loyalty program to fill empty premium seats.

5 min read
Which Mexican Escape Matches Your Travel Style?
Quiz

Which Mexican Escape Matches Your Travel Style?

From barefoot beach bliss to vibrant city energy and jungle hideaways—find your